High Court rejects anti force-feeding petition for Arab terrorists on hunger strike
A panel of High Court judge rejected a petition Sunday, which called to cancel the force-feeding of detainees and prisoners. Supreme Court Judges Elyakim Rubinstein, Noam Solberg and Menachem Meni Mazuz held that an amendment to the order given to Israeli prisons, which allows for force-feeding prisoners while working to prevent causing damage to their health, upholds any constitutional yardstick regarding the rights of prisoners and detainees.
The judges noted that they had come to their decision after reviewing claims in light of former Israeli rulings, international law, comparative law and Hebrew law.
In their decision, the judges also explained that allowing the force-feeding of prisoners maintains a gentle balance between the sanctity of life, public interests, the individual’s right to dignity, their right to autonomy and freedom of expression. The decision was reportedly also based on several medical, legal and judicial sources.
The Knesset Assembly voted the “force-feed” bill into law in July 2015, after a long process to get it approved. An amendment to the order given to Israeli prisons acts in this case as a measure of oversight to prison force-feeding, allowing a representative of the prison to approach a district court judge and, with the permission of the attorney general, ask that a prisoner on a self-imposed hunger strike receive medical attention.
The approval of the law raised a great deal of opposition from medical experts, and in a recent case even came to physicians refusing to force-feed Mohammed Allaan, an Arab terrorist detainee who went on a hunger strike.