Helping ‘Palestinians’ was an uphill battle for US aid chief

After 11 years of helping oversee the US government’s aid efforts to lay the foundations for a future Palestinian state, the outgoing chief of the US Agency for International Development mission in Judea, Samaria and Gaza Strip is unsure whether that vision has inched any closer to reality.

“It’s frustrating. It’s definitely frustrating,” said Dave Harden, who is leaving his post on Friday and returning to Washington to become an assistant administrator of USAID.

“Frustrating” is a word Harden said repeatedly in an interview with The Associated Press. During his tenure, he saw three US envoys attempt, and fail, to advance the cause of peace. He worked in one of the world’s most complicated political arenas and headed one of the most scrutinized USAID missions, on account of American lawmakers’ concerns that American money could reach Palestinian terrorists.


Starting as deputy mission director in 2005 and later taking the helm of USAID’s mission in the Palestinian territories, Harden presided over some $3.8 billion in investments to help improve Palestinians’ lives—from paving roads, laying water lines and building schools, to funding the Palestinian version of the children’s television show Sesame Street and helping a Palestinian fair trade olive oil distributor supply oil to the Whole Foods supermarket chain in the US

USAID recipients must sign an anti-terrorism clause to ensure money doesn’t get into terrorists’ hands.

Those restrictions limit the extent to which the US can help Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip, which saw three devastating Israeli military operations in the last decade in response to Gaza’s terrorism against Israel.

There are only a few hospitals USAID can support in Gaza, Harden said, because the ruling Islamic terrorist group Hamas controls most of the territory’s hospitals. The US, like Israel and the European Union, considers Hamas a terrorist group and has no direct contacts with it.

Harden counts among his successes negotiating with Israeli military officials to approve development projects in Judea and Samaria.

One was to help turn around the city of Jenin, once known as a hotbed of terrorist activity. “Jenin was a no-go zone,” he said. “Jenin was dangerous, poor, despairing.”

In 2007, Harden said, he helped convince hesitant Israeli military officials to allow Palestinian merchants in Jenin to export goods to Israel and abroad. USAID invested nearly $10 million in security scanners and upgrades to the Israeli-manned entrance and exit into the city to ensure it was secure. He said he also negotiated with Israel to allow its Arab citizens to come to Jenin for weekend shopping sprees, what he called “a very big psychological deal for the Israelis.”

Harden estimated that this led to a $230 million economic boost in the city. He also believes the boost has contributed to the low number of Palestinians from the Jenin area who have carried out attacks against Israelis during the current 10-month wave of terror. He said he hoped the Jenin example could be replicated for other cities of Judea and Samaria.

USAID has also invested more than $300 million in hundreds of water projects in Judea, Samaria and Gaza, including laying 960 kilometers of water pipelines, connecting 149,000 Palestinians to running water for the first time and giving more than one million people access to clean water.

Since 2011, USAID also secured Israeli permits for 20 Palestinian infrastructure projects in the politically sensitive areas of Area C—sections of Judea and Samaria that remain under full Israeli control.

This land, home to Israeli Jewish communities and military bases, makes up over 60 percent of Judea and Samaria.


USAID’s close relationship with the Israeli military helped the agency advance development projects in Area C, while illegal European funded projects have been bulldozed by the Israeli army because they were without proper authorization.

Harden said his agency’s mandate is limited when it comes to realizing the vision of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.

“We operate in a political framework that defines the answer to the two-state solution. It’s not something that I can control,” he said.

Much of Harden’s time was spent jetting to Washington to meet with lawmakers who had what he called “intense, intense, intense” skepticism about how US aid is used in the Palestinian territories. Harden said he forged bipartisan support in Congress and constructive discussions with lawmakers.

“There are relatively easy arguments to make when you have to explain it,” he said. “Do we want to deliver water? Do we want to build roads?”

In the face of a shaky political reality in the Palestinian territories and shaky political support in the US for Palestinian aid programs, Harden hopes the investments will last.

“That would be something that worries me as I walk out the door,” he said.